Aug 11, 2010
Get Fired: A New Framework for Change, Part 1 of 4
“If staying on the cutting edge is critical to your business, here you’ll find insights for generating and implementing radical ideas that will make your company an industry leader.”
In the latest issue of Design Management Review, I co-authored an article with John Stone on building innovation into organizations. Now, in the first of a four part series I’m posting that article here.
Innovation, anyone? The Tipping Point. Inside the Tornado. The New, New Thing. You’ve probably read one of these books, or heard that you should. You’re not alone. Over the past 10 years, nearly everyone has boarded the innovation plane—at least in theory.
With all this talk about increasing value for customers and shareholders through innovation, why aren’t there more companies actually doing it, like Apple, or Google, or Virgin? The problem is not a lack of revolutionary ideas—it’s an inability to pick, package, and ship the revolution.
When a big idea strikes, people have serious difficulties making it happen. You can read all the curb-jumping, paradigm-shifting, out-of-the-box innovation books you can order, but it won’t make any difference until you take on the true challenge: bringing that new idea to market.
Why are big, valuable ideas so often hard to realize? In part, because they’re perceived as risky. That’s not surprising, considering that generations of business leaders have been taught to strive for predictability and reliability. Today, most businesses are built for stability, not innovation.
Let’s be clear: Reliability and predictability are good for business. They can generate value, profit, and professional success. But when they alone become the drumbeat for an organization, they can stifle the next big business idea. Would-be innovators who see opportunity for new, unproven ideas may not pursue them for fear of their corporate reputations, their advancement potential, and even the loss of their jobs.
We believe that ideas normally considered out of bounds are more likely to succeed if they are paired with a deliberative process that exposes their true risks and rewards. We call it the Get Fired hypothesis. This method adds credibility to an innovator’s idea while mitigating risk for those that decide what to pursue.
Why call it “Get Fired”? It’s the metaphoric benchmark for what it may take to convince an organization to support an unproven concept that could potentially fail. No one is advocating that anyone actually lose his or her employment—rather, it’s a way to prepare yourself to say and do those things you thought too outlandish before.
There are companies that time and again successfully explore and implement risky ideas—ideas that might otherwise put managers and executives at risk. How do those companies “de-risk” unproven concepts, mitigate the anxiety of failure, and ultimately create the biggest possible value?
Design is a core value for many companies that succeed in realizing radical ideas. Consequently, to test our Get Fired hypothesis we went to two organizations known for their design prowess—Saffron Consultants and Steelcase—to understand how they consistently generate valuable new ideas and successfully take them to market.
NEXT: Part 2 – Case study of Saffron Consultants.